Is it really hard to be original? The know-how of the news commentary

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

No matter what content to write, first of all, we must start from the structure, grasp what is what, why, how to do these three parts, the three parts of the understanding, write well, you will be successful in this review.

Do news, unavoidable to write commentary, especially the reporter engaged in economic reporting, commentary writing can be said to be commonplace, a necessary basic skills.

What are the tips for writing a commentary? Think carefully, there are some tricks, that is, no matter what content to write, first of all, to start from the structure, grasp the three paragraph or three parts, the three parts of the understanding, write well, you will be successful in this review. What are the three parts?

The first part, is what.

Part Two, why.

The third part, how to do.

Very simple, in these three parts. Again complex no good write commentary, with three paragraph type set, almost never, without exception.

For instance. The year before autumn, the author to Shanghai Pudong Cadre College to attend training, by the way back to Fudan University to see. The school leaders know that I graduated from the Department of Journalism, said, old Zhan, Fudan is about to celebrate the 100 anniversary of the school, this is a big thing. As a Fudan graduate, and work in the central media, can you write a report for the 100 anniversary of your alma mater? I know this matter is very difficult, dare not agree, on second thought, our economic daily editor fan not once said, "As long as a good point of view, there is no not to write news." Because the article is not easy to write, is a rare exercise opportunity. So promised to come down, after the interview, wrote a lengthy review of about 6,000 words "Fudan: Aiming at world-class university", issued a whole edition, the reflection is not bad.

What does this review say? Very simple, three parts.

The first part, the title three words: Why?

Today, why some key universities, especially famous universities, such as Beida, Tsinghua, Fudan, Zhejiang, south and so on, have put forward to build world-class universities? It's no coincidence. Because, the core competitiveness of a country, in the final analysis is nothing but technology, talent and knowledge of these three. And technology, talent, knowledge and the cultivation of points and points, in the university. If a country does not have a first-class university, it is impossible to build a first-rate country. One of the important reasons why the United States has become the 9374.html "> World Economic Power" is that it has a group of world-class universities. In the process of moving towards a world power, China naturally has to build a group of world-class universities. This clarifies the necessity and urgency of Fudan University's world-class universities.

The second part, the title is also three words: what is it?

Since China must build a group of world-class universities. People will naturally ask, what exactly is the world class university, and what standards does it have? There is no doubt that first-class universities, should have first-class teachers, first-class disciplines, but also have a first-class environment (hard environment and soft environments), as well as first-class results. If there are no more than four items, what about world class universities? What about the teachers and subjects of Fudan University? What about the hard soft environment and academic achievements? What is the ranking in China and the world? This part is analyzed in detail.

The third part, how to do?

Through analysis, Fudan University from the world's top universities there is no small gap. What do we do? Where does the first class teacher come from? How to cultivate the first-class discipline? Fudan has its own considerations and countermeasures. Finally, it is concluded that only after a long period of unremitting efforts, Fudan University's goal of building world-class universities can be achieved.

More than 6,000 words of commentary, writing is the above content. After the publication of the article, the school leadership is very satisfied, in the reader also aroused certain repercussions.

What needs to be said is that the three-paragraph arrangement, can be flexible interspersed. The "Fudan" article does not put "what" in the first part, because building world-class universities is not news of the event. If you start with a world-class university, readers will not be interested. Instead, you first say "why", that is, why China must build a first-class university, not to build it is not it? First the need to write clearly, then the reader will naturally be concerned about what the first-class university standards, in the end "what", how to build a world-class university, should "how to do".

There are a number of examples of the three-paragraph commentary. In the early 90, the author has written a "few enterprises die, most enterprises live well." Speaking of this commentary, there is also a story. At that time, I was the Economic daily CHUM Department director, editor-in-chief Vaughn after the central Economic work conference back, want us to write a commentary on how to enliven state-owned enterprises. I racked my brains, into a draft, the title of "How to kill the enterprise." Why is it so pen? Because, only to kill a part of the enterprise, can make most enterprises enliven. The article this conception, get old fan affirmation, but he said the title certainly not! The central meeting said how to enliven the enterprise, you come to an article how to kill the enterprise, this is not to do? But it doesn't matter, you can change a topic. In the afternoon, he called me to say, the country pivot, the topic has already thought well, called "a few enterprises not to die, most enterprises live badly", you see how? I listen, it's great! The article was on the headlines the next day, and it was very responsive to the readers, since very few people had asked questions from that point of view.

This review is also a three-paragraph:

First, what is it? The main state-owned enterprises in China's current situation: the state-owned enterprise has built a lot, the overall benefit is very poor.

Second, why? Why is the overall benefit so poor? One important reason is that some of the companies that should be eliminated will never be eliminated. The article to the daily phenomenon as a metaphor, wrote: Nursery, planted a lot of small seedlings, originally growing well, but to a certain extent can not grow, because the seedlings are too many, very crowded! The sun, the air, the water, are not enough. What do we do? Add sunshine to it, lighting it every night, give it a blow, fertilize it, OK? The only way to do that is to be decisive thinning! Most saplings survive only if a handful of saplings die. In the natural world, isn't the same in business?

Third, how to do? How to let a part of the enterprise die, what is the standard? How to dispose of the dead enterprise property and how to settle the employee? This paper puts forward the problems of enterprise bankruptcy and employee's insurance placement, which is mentioned earlier in the economic report.

Not long ago, I saw a review by Professor Wei of Tsinghua University, "attention and response to the arrival of the high cost era." This paper reveals a very important economic trend in our country, that is, the era of high cost of enterprise has come. The article is divided into three parts.

First, what is it? In today's China, the enterprise production cost rises sharply, the profit generally reduces, the enterprise survival pressure is more and more big.

Second, why is there such a phenomenon? First, the enterprise energy costs rise, irreversible. Second, the price of raw materials rise. The third is the rising cost of transportation. Four is the environment, land, environmental protection and other investment increased. The wages of workers are getting higher, and the cost of labor is rising sharply. Six is the import of raw materials and other prices continue to rise. In short, due to the acceleration of China's industrialization and urbanization process, enterprises in all aspects of the rapid increase in costs, profit reduction, so the era of high cost enterprises have come.

Third, what to do? The article proposes some countermeasures, what should the government do? What should the enterprise do? The whole article, on three parts, write very concentrated, also very wonderful.

The three-paragraph method of writing sounds very simple, but it works very well. A review, as long as the three parts of the careful writing, write well, will certainly be welcomed by the reader. For example, the current vast number of readers are very concerned about the city's soaring housing prices. If the newspaper sent reporters, serious research and interviews, the country's major cities real estate prices to learn more about the actual situation, write clear "what"; at the same time, consult experts and scholars and government departments and real estate enterprises concerned to find out the real reasons for the soaring housing prices, to understand the "why"; Then carefully carding the solution to the soaring housing prices and ideas, but also learn from some of the more mature experience abroad. So write the article, is not wonderful, no one to see it?

Another example is the Korean nuclear crisis that erupted in the previous days, and people are concerned. What if it's from "What" (is North Korea doing nuclear experiments?) Why "(why does North Korea defying nuclear tests at this time?) What to do? What about the international community? What about the United States and Western countries? Three-paragraph entry

Hand, will certainly write a good article.

A three-paragraph review of writing is a rule, with few exceptions. But specific to an article, and not "what is, why, how to do" Everything liver complete, each equal. Some articles, can focus on "what", some focus on "why", and some focus on "how to Do". For example, when a phenomenon is not clear to everyone, you can focus on "what". As for "Why", if the reason is unknown, do some preliminary analysis can be. and "How to", you can write some general ideas and ideas to solve the problem. And sometimes, "what" everybody already knew, the fact is very clear, just do not understand "why", Want to Know "how", you might as well in the latter two aspects more make hard.

Why does the three-paragraph formula work so well in practice? Think about it, probably because the three-paragraph style of the news facts and all aspects of the whole covered it. From the perspective of space-time relationship, "what" is mainly about the present, "why" mainly talk about the past, "How to" is mainly about the future. The past, the present, the future, the space-time relationship, all have, what do you not understand?

In the specific writing, the three-paragraph type of emphasis is different.

"What is" is a matter of refinement-a lot of facts and details.

"Why" is the deep search for the truth behind the facts.

"What to do" is to be realistic--to give the idea and method to solve the problem.

It is interesting to say that the three-paragraph style as a skill, not only can be used to review writing, but also by extension, for other writing. Remember when I was in the economic daily Deputy editor-in-chief, the newspaper to "maintain the advanced nature of the party members of education activities", not every party members should write their own analysis of materials? Some of my department directors asked me, old Jayne, how to write this material? I said, very good to write, according to the commentary writing three paragraphs. First, first write "What", talk about the current thinking and work situation, compared to the advanced nature of communists, what are their own problems and deficiencies? Second, write "Why", why is there such problems? Finally write "How to", in response to these problems, how to do, what measures to take to correct their shortcomings? It's not hard to write.

It's not difficult. Everybody listens, nods to smile, this said is simple, really is not difficult.