Six styles of leadership, how to use the most suitable for your entrepreneurial team?

Bringing a team out of the ordinary is not common, meaning understanding and accepting the differences between management and leadership in the team. The writer asks Peter Drucker said: "Management ability is to make things right; leadership is doing the right thing."

In the company, managers and leaders, sometimes we may be confused, but these two positions are completely different. Managers are the promoter of success for team members, he assures that the team members are highly productive and that the projects being developed by the team are successful; managers are mostly well-trained and optimistic, able to clear up obstacles to success, most of them capable of coping with a number of challenges and quick promotions.

On the contrary, the leadership is worthy of a team of special talent, they have a wide range of thinking, ideas, in a certain area have a lot of experience, can provide managers and the entire team to help. Leaders are able to lead because they have strengths, not "leadership" titles.

Good managers can adapt to different leadership and lead the team forward.

When you are faced with difficulties and challenges, when you can not find the right solution when you face the difficult problems, the title on the card is no more powerful and will not help you. Sometimes, a project has to go through countless problems, sometimes the opportunity is too fast to grasp, so need teamwork, use all the wisdom and skills to solve problems, overcome difficulties.

Why is the way of militarized leadership in this fast-growing world not? That's the reason. I think Tom Peter is right, he said: "Good leadership will not create more employees, but to develop more leadership." "When we share how to lead the company, a group of people with special talents get together to develop long-term and workable solutions for the company, overcoming unknown challenges and challenges," he said.

Change the style of leadership

Not only do team members allow leaders with different abilities to take turns leading the team, they also understand that the leadership's ability to change is due to the environment and needs of the team. Sometimes teams need to be cared for by others, and sometimes the team needs physical training. Like playing golf, different venues require different clubs, and leaders are not only knowledgeable about the company's business and ultimate development goals, but also change leadership styles at any time.

According to Daniel Goleman's three-year survey of more than 3,000 middle-level managers, he came up with a report on the results of the leadership decision. The purpose of his investigation is to discover the effects of a particular leadership style in a team-work environment.

Surveys show that the way managers lead will affect a company's 30% gain! Even a leadership approach that generates 1% of the influence can create a lot of profit for the company, and it can reduce the amount of spending on the business and efficiency.

Here are 6 types of leadership styles and the effectiveness of different leadership styles in the team after Goleman research:

1, benchmarking Leadership: with excellent performance and self-guidance to become team members of the Imitation object. If this style of leadership is condensed into a sentence, it is "do as I do, right away!" "When team members are skilled and mobilized, it is most appropriate to use benchmarking leadership." But this style, if used too much, will suppress the team members, stifling innovation.

2, authoritative leadership: To promote the whole team to move forward, focus on the final results, so that members of the team to deal with the problem themselves. If this style of leadership is condensed into one sentence, it is "Follow me". Authoritative leadership is best when the team needs a new development vision and the environment changes. Authoritative leadership is full of entrepreneurial spirit, providing the whole team with entrepreneurial passion. But if someone on the team is more professional than he is, this style may not be appropriate.

3, Affinity leadership: With team members to develop feelings, so that they have a team member of the feeling of a pro. If this style of leadership is condensed into a sentence, it is "people-oriented." This affinity is the most appropriate form of leadership when the team is under pressure, the member needs psychological comfort, or needs to rebuild confidence. This style of leadership is also not used frequently, and overuse tends to lead to excessive reliance on leadership and lack of direction.

4, guidance-style leadership: For the future of the enterprise Training team members. If this style of leadership is condensed into one sentence, it is "try this." This mentoring is very effective when leaders want to nurture the individual's lifelong ability. But if team members are defiant, don't want to learn or change, or the leadership business is not skilled, this style of leadership will be very inefficient.

5. High-pressure leadership: Require members to be absolutely obedient to the leadership. If this style of leadership is condensed into one sentence, it is "do what you are told to do". High-pressure leadership is most effective when the team is facing a crisis, such as a corporate transformation, a program reorganization, or a fire or flood. It is also very effective in dealing with troublesome team members. Use caution because this style of leadership is easy to break away from team members, stifling flexibility and creativity.

6, Democratic leadership: through the full participation of consensus-building. If this style of leadership is condensed into one sentence, it is "What do you think you should do"? Democratic leadership is most effective when the team is faced with choices, plans, and goals that are difficult to decide, or when leaders are unable to make a decision, and when a team of professionals presents fresh ideas. But this style of leadership is not appropriate in times of emergency when team members are informed of the lack of information.

Depending on the team's specific situation to choose a different leadership style, a variety of leadership style integration, which can motivate the entire team to achieve a lasting victory.

Article Source: FastCompany

Source: http://tech2ipo.com/54625