Xiaofeng: Don't take SEO2.0.

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

See a lot of people in the sentimental said seo2.0 is a new concept, seemingly seo2.0 is not SEO, take this to say something unconventional is meaningless.

Read a bunch of SEO2.0 on the blog, Kseo Charles℡ said the more objective: SEO2.0 is also a new concept.

Compared to the 15 point of the so-called SEO and seo2.0 difference, the practice of Seoer Basic use (of course not used mostly are unrestrained thinking, can be ignored). At best, it is a sublimation of thought, and it is not a technical improvement. I oppose the link absolute theory, also opposes the content absolute theory, because these 2 people are indispensable.

I first put the network on the so-called SEO and seo2.0 comparison list released: (More do not know what the so-called SEO SEO1.0, this may be reasonable right, 2.0 are out, no seo1.0 how the whole?)

This figure comes from Kseo blog

Looking at 15 points of comparison, it is not difficult to see SEO2.0 emphasis is an SEO idea, thought has its own shortcomings, or fantasy, or must be based on a certain basis.

Look at each point in detail:

One: Link building, SEO is simply manually added, submit directories and links? Do Seo dare to ask a few people did not use blog resources, did not write a soft text (equivalent to simple manufacturing link bait.) Therefore, the concept of seo2.0 is only summed up, and there is no practical technical update significance. Again, the role of the link is significant, how many people have time energy consumption in search engine optimization? According to SEO2.0 meaning, do seo how long time, not estimated.

Second: The object of SEO, SEO emphasis on the object is a search engine, the target page title content is optimized for keywords, and 2.0 is what? does not mean that the title, does not mean the search engine, the keyword to lose one side. So I have to ask, what is the concept of SEO? seo2.0 is this SEO? Does this help the search engine extract the content of the site?

Three: This point some do not know how to compare, SEO competitor keyword ranked top ten of the station, this sentence itself has a problem, too summary, if the main competitor is the top ten key words stand can also say the past. Can say, do the same keyword site are competitors, and the same keyword inside a large site also constitutes a competitive relationship. Seo2.0 's request for cooperation, link to subscribe to bloggers? What about the site? Do you do blog optimization or website optimization? Do you use a blog to do the keyword or use the blog to do external resources to the site? What's more, this is nothing more than to tell your blog subscribers, I have to add links to you, you see do? It's better to have a link directly.

Four: Again on the link problem, SEO is a large number of a one-to-one exchange, but has been improved, but not SEO2.0 that improvement. Cross-linking is a good effect, more practical than seo2.0. Seo2.0 can so understand, with more vulgar language is, throw a meat dumplings cheat the dog, throw a dog not come, continue to throw to the dog. This is still a very absurd concept, SEO has been a considerable number of uncertainties, you still have to continue to be manufacturing uncertainties? For a link, it takes so much effort and time to make a deal? Even if you get a link at the end. This is not the equivalent of the exchange link? and is to change one more, but also a change!

Five: Cover up, hide SEO customers, this is the protection of the interests of customers. seo2.0 requires openness, teamwork, and sharing. Teamwork is a good thing, this can achieve the maximum strength, but also to make China's SEO better development, promote national brand. Sharing experience is also a good proposal, but this is also the old topic, a lot of SEO blog is carrying out this mission, but the lack of what is always the authority, not to in-depth research. Always think of themselves bigger than all, Baidu we think Big bar, Robin Li? In front of the people of the country he 10 can not reach a Zhao Benshan, that is to say, we want to jump out of the circle, low-key life. These two points can be compared and not strong, to share and conceal the main body is different, SEO customer information to share, I am afraid it is not a simple thing. Share can only be in the operation of the SEO process of successful experience!

VI: This point if only for the blog, the role is obvious, and is now a lot of blog optimizer attention. But SEO optimization is to contain all the forms of the network, not only have a blog, there are forums, Veken, corporate sites and other various sites, this is relatively strong limitations.

Seven: links and traffic for SEO technology, links more advantages, from the SEM perspective, traffic for the site better. This point of contrast, put in the SEO concept is somewhat outdated. Flow of the site to do SEO is also in order to increase traffic again, there is no flow, no optimization of the new station, traffic from where to speak!

Eight: This is similar to the 6th, SEO the biggest role is what? The biggest role is to attract effective flow, high quality flow. A no click on the site, how to value the conversion rate more talk about brand, these must be based on the SEO, so seo2.0 so-called conversion rate and brand degree is very far-fetched. And this is not SEO technology can be achieved, need to cooperate with the corresponding marketing tools.

Nine: Do SEO site, landing only DMOZ directory of the site according to my statistics is not much, of course, may be my experience less reason. DMOZ directory for doing SEO site need to login difficulty is greater than social bookmarking, this point I am totally disagree, if change a location SEO: Social directory; The Seo2.0:dmoz directory is more appropriate.

Ten: SEO relies mainly on the mainstream search engine, seo2.0 more from social news sites, blogs and so on. First of all, from the concept of SEO, seo2.0 things are nonsense. Again from the source of traffic, these social news sites also need to get traffic from the search engines, we get traffic from these sites, how much traffic can have? Can flow directly from the search engine traffic more effective? Finally, these social news sites, blogs and so on are acting as SEO external resource roles, They can't replace the status of search engines.

11: This can be said that SEO is not relevant. The interactivity of the website is the network marketing, the website operation inside important constituent, and SEO has no direct or indirect contact; if there is, then is the user experience, but the user experience is not only the interaction of the site alone.

12: I don't understand, so I don't argue.

13: This does not involve the meaning of democracy living without democracy. If you want to add a comparison of SEO, it is the comparison of the operation of the team's technical Force SEO, Team technology strong so ranked before the team technical strength weak, then ranked back. This is also in line with Darwin's theory of evolution, survival of the fittest. If according to seo2.0 then there are some communist ideas, of course, do not rule out the Western Communist ideology (the concept of seo2.0 is not Chinese), which in the current increasingly fierce network competition environment is completely utopian, fantasy. Then to add a democratic and undemocratic concept, that is, seo2.0 's author yy!

14: Automation This I and Le Si shu key, can be operated by the machine absolutely do not let manual operation, seo2.0 to the contrary, 10% of automation, that think to see the human cost of SEO to 90% is reasonable?

XV: SEO is a technology, more precisely is a tool, to give the tool to add emotion, seo2.0 's author seems to be equivalent to the Chinese fairy tale of nu wa empress. Emotion should be aimed at Seoer said, let seoer to SEO to give more specialized research and energy poured, rather than the SEO as an emotional tool. If it is the search engine's emotional tools, more reasonable, I guess good words, is to do white hat. Black hat on search engine heartless sensibility can say!

Xiaofeng above remarks only on behalf of their own SEO2.0 with SEO comparison of some different views, personal color is more serious, I think the world should not and I am completely human beings at the same time? Then you are reproduced in the matter, please attach my name. Otherwise, there will be a person who is exactly the same as me, and that would probably be the most mine for 2009 years!