When the internet appears to "monopolize" entrepreneurial paradise there is no more than 3.0

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest stationmaster buy cloud host technology Hall

These days the blog has a big machine, the Web site around, now still busy. If you did not enter yesterday or today, I would like to apologize to you and thank you for coming to our station again today.

It's so simple to write a blog, write an article, put it on top, you can see it, but yesterday's feelings, such as the throat was pinched, when the phone came to the machine tenant staff very no level called me "call Tomorrow", really have a very deep sense of powerlessness-my website is "my", but encountered this situation is " Kidnapping ", I am the owner, how also not to go to their own web site, can only wait a second time in the past. In the physical business world, 99% of things are the case, must follow some "monopoly" manufacturers to go, or have to deliberately choose the way they do not go, the road is particularly difficult to go!

Only on the Internet, entrepreneurs have the space to breathe.

It's really nice! We were like a wilderness in Connaught, running naked, without having to by defeating others, we all have the opportunity, we all have their own channel, want to see the people will go to see, want to use the person can go to use, want to pay the person also directly take money out, so, 5000 of people's company maybe[http:// Www.icomcn.com] to 3 students, 50 experts were defeated by a few, uh, bloggers.

So this morning, in time of great urgency, again from the last issue of the "digital era" excerpts from the column, add a few new ideas, for you to refer to-when the network also began to appear "monopoly", what will happen?

May, the United States network is very lively, er, it should be said that the United States network is very lively, but three large network giants in order to make the network "more lively", have rushed in May launched their own " Outside station community function, let the small site directly free use, for each station add more popularity, such as social networking site Facebook launched Facebook Connect, so that the outside station can also directly through its API to extract and use the inside of personal files, MySpace launched data Availability, so that the outside station can be combined with MySpace members. Google is the introduction of friend Connect, so that the outside station easily embedded in a community, as simple as AdSense.

These companies have coincidentally robbed the same May to engage in "open", the reason is simple-they want to take the first step of the station's "version", first win.

And this thing reminds me of "monopoly".

There is a word on the network "winner takes all", if you can monopolize, the site instantly caused great entry threshold, so that other people can not enter. But the web itself is still full of small websites today, because when Yahoo!, Google, EBay and Amazon try to expand their brands, they can't really monopolize the entire network. Small station because as long as a Web site can be linked to the past, coupled with the spread of viral design, as well as the lower cost of development and maintenance, we see that even the large number of manufacturers, today many of the successful website is still created by young people.

And now, the three big websites are playing the banner of "open", start to rob the layout of the station, the effect of the small station is still unclear, but they want to create a "other people are embedded, you also want to embed" the half force effect is consistent, they rob zoned domain enclosure, so, the network unique freedom, has slowly disappeared.

For example, we launched a Facebook plugin "friends ' numbers" two weeks ago to collect data for another site we're making. We took a look at the "Contagion" feature of Facebook's news feed and asked an engineer to complete the small plug-in program in just 2 weeks and submit it to Facebook as per the procedure.

Unexpectedly, a day passed, two days passed, three days later, although Facebook replied "has been approved", but has not seen our plug-in is selected into the so-called "new application" area. If you do not enter this area, there is no way to attract the advance users. Last week we finally wrote to Facebook to protest, and found in the Facebook discussion area that a lot of plug-in vendors had the same situation, and even though Facebook helped us fix it two days later, we couldn't rank in the latest rankings because we weren't "new plugins". In other words, our original plan was completely ruined.

We have to sigh, although these sites help you to do a good job in the community structure, but also equal to the "control of this community structure", if it happened like two weeks ago this "no show" incident, we can only blow beard stare! Fortunately we have a strictly controlled time, not more than two weeks, that, others if someone spends a year doing such a plugin, Finally know that Facebook does not authorize it?

"Monopoly" is invisible, only just by its cold door blocked outside people, will feel its ruthless, its terrible. I may be monopolized by the big companies, and I am deeply afraid of the doubts. So, when we had a heated discussion of "web 3.0", a lot of people say is "mobile communication", well, look at the current iphone software, Google's Android platform, etc., this is certainly a beautiful future, but it is a beautiful future, it does not reduce the "it is not a clean grassland" the fact. Because these mobile communications industry has a factory control, all the application or content provider and each layer to the accounting, the advantage is immediately have income, the disadvantage is that the income is not more where to go, and the manufacturers tied tightly.

Tied tightly by the factory.

So if you still want to talk about the word "web 3.0", ask me, I'll give you another answer forever. My answer is different every time, this time I think, the Web 2.0 than the Web more than 1 Yun a layer of users called "share", about 5% of the global network of people, that Web 3.0 will be another batch of 5%". In Web 2.0 these people have something to say and enjoy online communication on the Web 3.0, due to the pressure of profit, the entrepreneur will try to get back the long tail theory of profit and more than 10 years ago the value of the information explosion, this "another batch of 5%" will be a group " Weak silent division, not the mobility of people, not low-income and so on, but a group by the real business social pressure, these people with their weak place and the audience, each of the audience may have a website. At the end only 5%, but they will pay, or other people get these no more vulnerable people, will also pay.

All this, the best side of the site, or its "no monopoly" characteristics. This trait must continue, can not let the manufacturers, false by "open" in the name, to silently stole!