Please give more tolerance to the founder

A recently named Yu Jiawen CEO of the domineering speech shocked the entire Internet circle, the alleged next year to take 100 million profits to employees of the domineering CEO soon in the knowledge of the call on the road experts, anonymous people lying upside down. From the day before being held in the sky to a day after being slammed to the ground, this is the cost of the first-year entrepreneurs do not obey the rules.

Although subsequently Yu Jiawen in the micro-blog dedicated to the knowledge of their education, financing, user data and so on questioned to do a corresponding response, but still negative from the public opinion, especially with the previous Ma Jiajia hype put together, generally give people a "not reliable" feeling.

Unlike many entrepreneurial projects, this is driven by the cusp of the super timetable team are basically grassroots, no prominent background, gorgeous education, glamorous career history, from scratch to succeed from scratch to win Ali's venture capital, no matter how much profit, the number of users, the number of financing, It is not easy to walk to this stage.

If there is a mistake, the CEO is too high-profile, breaking the South China entrepreneurs have always been a low-key and pragmatic tradition, but also in the Guangdong region entrepreneurs rarely boarded the Chinese internet circle of the headlines, before the Ma Jiajia, 郝畅, carving Ye's case is basically born in the capital, Few field cases have attracted the attention of mainstream internet circles.

In fact, as an entrepreneur, how high-profile are not excessive, especially grassroots entrepreneurial team. If there are tens of millions of everywhere to hit the TV ads, outdoor advertising, you do not need entrepreneurs to do their own personal endorsement. Feeling, dare to do, dare to break the conventional is the most valuable entrepreneur quality, this is the American dream and the Chinese dream difference.

Many people are wondering why a billion of of people in China can't get a Bill Gates or Zuckerberg. Can't even develop a Nobel Prize scientist? The real reason behind this is the lack of innovation culture, which is the biggest obstacle to the current economic and social transformation in China. For many years the policy has emphasized that economic growth is driven by innovation, but what is the driving force for innovation? In essence, we must rely on innovative talents, innovative culture and innovation and technology.

Since ancient times hero out of the juvenile, 30 years old before the young people have thought, vitality, dare to dare to do, has always been innovative entrepreneurship. From the statistics of successful entrepreneurs around the world, whether it's America's tech giants jobs, Bill Gates, page and Zuckerberg, or the Chinese internet giant's founder, Jack Ma, Ding Lei and pony, they started a company at the age of more than 20, and from the beginning, they didn't smell a small business growing up to be the world's big business.

And the Chinese generation due to high housing prices, turbulent economic environment, the heavy burden of living has basically missed the best entrepreneurial age, the current entrepreneurial tide is basically the number of new entrepreneurs, so the whole society needs to young creative entrepreneurship to give more tolerance and support, Thus avoiding the tragedy that young people can only crowd the civil servants. For more analysis, see "The decline of the entrepreneurial group: Lost".

The current society, from top to bottom are basically young people you do not understand, do not understand the unspoken rules of society, do not understand the social situation, do not know how to comply with the rules. As the recent crazy biography of the University of Law female students of the amazing speech "one day the bank president will be a student, entrepreneurs will be, and even the national owner is a, when the whole society is occupied by the occupation, we want to turn this society into what?" "If China is still a society that needs to be able to do it after 10 years, then the country cannot really be strong, and innovation can only stay on policy papers and slogans," he said.